Difference between revisions of "Benefits"

From coreboot
Jump to: navigation, search
(Why LinuxBIOS sucks less...)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
* TPMs...
 
* TPMs...
  
All of this is (or can be) fixed in LinuxBIOS, as it's open source. With a proprietary BIOS you're dependant on the good-will of the vendor to fix these issues.
+
All of this is (or can be) fixed in coreboot, as it's open source. With a proprietary BIOS you're dependant on the good-will of the vendor to fix these issues.
  
== Some anecdotes where LinuxBIOS saved the day ==
+
== coreboot features proprietary BIOSes usually lack ==
 +
 
 +
* Boot from NAND Flash (and other nonstandard media), which most proprietary BIOSes don't support
 +
* Debugging output on the serial console
 +
* ...
 +
 
 +
== Some anecdotes where coreboot saved the day ==
  
 
* The "Press F1 to continue" error on a cluster (without a single keyboard attached).
 
* The "Press F1 to continue" error on a cluster (without a single keyboard attached).
* Improved Fan control behaviour: http://www.linuxbios.org/pipermail/linuxbios/2007-May/021049.html
+
* Improved Fan control behaviour: http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2007-May/021128.html
 +
* On the VIA EPIA MII-6000 and the EPIA-10000 coreboot can boot from CompactFlash, whereas the proprietary BIOS is known to not support this.
 
* ...
 
* ...
 +
 +
= Later: categories =
 +
 +
== End Users ==
 +
 +
== Developers ==
 +
 +
== Hardware Vendors ==
 +
 +
== System Integrators ==

Latest revision as of 15:01, 15 January 2008

Note: This page is work in progress!

Benefits

  • 100% Free Software (GPL), no royalties, no license fees!
  • Fast boot times (3 seconds from power-on to Linux console)
  • Avoids the need for a slow, buggy, proprietary BIOS
  • Runs in 32-Bit protected mode almost from the start
  • Written in C, contains virtually no assembly code
  • Supports a wide variety of hardware and payloads
  • Further features: netboot, serial console, remote flashing, ...

Possible Advantages

  • Some BIOSes don't enable hardware virtualization features (AMD / Intel), thus you cannot use that feature of your hardware (e.g. for XEN, KVM, etc).
  • Some BIOSes don't enable HPET (can be used by Linux for enhanced power-saving features, e.g. on laptops), see linuxpowertop.org.
  • TPMs...

All of this is (or can be) fixed in coreboot, as it's open source. With a proprietary BIOS you're dependant on the good-will of the vendor to fix these issues.

coreboot features proprietary BIOSes usually lack

  • Boot from NAND Flash (and other nonstandard media), which most proprietary BIOSes don't support
  • Debugging output on the serial console
  • ...

Some anecdotes where coreboot saved the day

  • The "Press F1 to continue" error on a cluster (without a single keyboard attached).
  • Improved Fan control behaviour: http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2007-May/021128.html
  • On the VIA EPIA MII-6000 and the EPIA-10000 coreboot can boot from CompactFlash, whereas the proprietary BIOS is known to not support this.
  • ...

Later: categories

End Users

Developers

Hardware Vendors

System Integrators