file system error
Ronald G. Minnich
rminnich at lanl.gov
Mon Dec 9 10:19:00 CET 2002
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, steven james wrote:
> That's looking likely, but it seems that 48M are being eaten somewhere
> (quite possably SMA). Unless you actually want an SMA that big, it might
> be good to look at the registers for SMA using lspci after a LinuxBIOS
> boot. You'll probably have to add some code to initialize that/those
> registers. It could be that SMA is taking 48M due to an undocumented or
> reserved value in the register.
what's odd here is that the memory sizer functions should reduce the
memory by the amount of SMA size.
More information about the coreboot