file system error

Ronald G. Minnich rminnich at lanl.gov
Mon Dec 9 10:19:00 CET 2002


On Mon, 9 Dec 2002, steven james wrote:

> That's looking likely, but it seems that 48M are being eaten somewhere
> (quite possably SMA). Unless you actually want an SMA that big, it might
> be good to look at the registers for SMA using lspci after a LinuxBIOS
> boot. You'll probably have to add some code to initialize that/those
> registers. It could be that SMA is taking 48M due to an undocumented or
> reserved value in the register.

what's odd here is that the memory sizer functions should reduce the 
memory by the amount of SMA size. 





More information about the coreboot mailing list