DOC vs. IDE
Steve M. Gehlbach
steve at nexpath.com
Mon Sep 30 00:42:01 CEST 2002
>> So DoC _IS_ faster than IDE? If this is the case, why should it be
>> that mounting it with /dev/hda1 as root would make for a faster boot?
>> By my logic, I would think that having /boot and /root on a DoC would
>> make it faster.
>DoC _IS_NOT_ faster than IDE. IDE HD has the problem it need to spin up
>before taking any command while DoC does not. This spin up time delays
>you booting speed. On the other hand, once spun up IDE HD is much faster
I've been loading the Linux kernel from CompactFlash (CF) (raw image) in
/dev/hdc1, and then mount the root disk in /dev/hda1, and this is pretty
fast. I shortened the delays in the IDE routine since the CF doesn't need
spin up time. We really need an "intelligent" routine to find when an IDE
device is ready rather than a pure time delay.
More information about the coreboot