IRQ assignment on my IBM X24
ollie lho
ollie at sis.com.tw
Mon Apr 7 03:27:01 CEST 2003
On Mon, 2003-04-07 at 10:40, ron minnich wrote:
> this seems really poor bios design:
> @mini rminnich]# lspci -v -v | grep Interrupt
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin C routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin B routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
> Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 11
>
> Pretty much everyone goes to IRQ 11.
>
> And a bunch of Interrupts go unused:
>
> CPU0
> 0: 3381694 XT-PIC timer
> 1: 13873 XT-PIC keyboard
> 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> 8: 1 XT-PIC rtc
> 11: 77842 XT-PIC usb-uhci, usb-uhci, usb-uhci, eth0,
> wlan0, Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II, Ricoh Co Ltd RL5c476 II (#2)
> 12: 360259 XT-PIC PS/2 Mouse
> 14: 85559 XT-PIC ide0
> NMI: 0
> ERR: 0
>
>
Wow !!! Is it the common case for IBM notebooks ?? I though they were
built for quality !!
--
ollie lho <ollie at sis.com.tw>
More information about the coreboot
mailing list