linuxbios build problems
Ronald G. Minnich
rminnich at lanl.gov
Wed Feb 12 11:13:01 CET 2003
On 12 Feb 2003, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Part of the problem was is that someone was using 1st stage defines
> in the 2nd stage, which is quiet unexpected. intel_chip_post is
> possibly the one define that is safe to use both places.
no argument that it was a mistake in what the person did, my only concern
was that so many (me too!) got so confused :-)
I love the compressed 2nd stage ... you were right, the shrinkage is very
useful. My fallback now does log level 9 (!) and still fits in 40k!
More information about the coreboot