Source code control
adam at megacz.com
Tue Jan 6 02:49:00 CET 2004
ron minnich <rminnich at lanl.gov> writes:
> darcs requires people to get a Haskell and build it. Not so sure I like
We solved this problem by distributing statically linked binaries.
Not ideal, but generally workable. Feel free to use them:
> In the end, what does arch do better than bitkeeper?
I think for many people (including me), BitMover's recent shenanigans
are more of a factor than the technical merits of their code. But I
really don't want to start that argument here. I do not claim that
darcs (or arch) has any features that BK lacks, except perhaps
More information about the coreboot