stepan at openbios.org
Thu Jun 3 14:42:01 CEST 2004
* ron minnich <rminnich at lanl.gov> [040603 17:23]:
> > the current pirq code defines intel_irq_routing_table as const, thus
> > making it potentially readonly.
> should be const due to execute-in-place issues.
What's the benefit in this case? we have dram long before this code is
run, and the table is really small. Should it be copied to ram
> > OTOH the code in arch/i386/boot/pirq_routing.c tries to correct the
> > checksum and size entries in that table.
> that's my fault I bet.
Nope, parts of that is my fault. But I still think it is a good idea to
go towards dynamic table creation.
Well.. maybe this discussion should be left for later..
More information about the coreboot