ACPI support

ron minnich rminnich at lanl.gov
Thu Mar 11 08:55:01 CET 2004


On 11 Mar 2004, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> If the BIOS has to implement services an interpreted byte code where the
> kernel provides the interpreter at least gives the kernel guys the
> option of catching bugs, and working around them.  I completely prefer
> AML over BIOS callbacks.

YES!

> Is AML turing complete?

I am sure it is. I am sure that it would be able to pass the Turing test, 
it is so complex :-)

ron




More information about the coreboot mailing list