FYI: Merge in progress...

[Eric W. Biederman]

Li-Ta Lo <ollie at lanl.gov> writes:

> On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 20:52, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > As for messing with RdDram and WrDram extension bits we are not
> > using the fixed mtrrs at this point and I fee that is better
> > a question left up cpu initialization code to handle later.
> > Hmm.  We don't actually handle it later either so I have just
> > added that code, there.    That way everything should be all in
> > one place.
> > 
> 
> I have done that but you removed they ALL in your new CPU thing.
> It was there for reasons, we need the RdDRAM/WrDram programmed
> correct for VGA devices.

Oops it was a big re-org and I had not realized I had missed some
of the cpu development.  What it should have been was a lot
of code motion and a few cleanups in structure I did not intend 
to drop any functionality.  

I still need to get back in there and implement overlapping mtrrs.

At this point we should be able to look at the device tree and
see if we need to use and io range register or the RdRam WrDram bits.

Eric