status information

Li-Ta Lo ollie at
Thu Oct 28 15:36:00 CEST 2004

On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 13:25, Ronald G. Minnich wrote:
> > Why don't we just enlarge the size to, say, 128kB ??
> YES!
> Rather than remove debugging names, let's to ahead and move things around!
> I've done this once and it worked. We need to fix the .lds for things. 

Last time I tried to do that it was not that simple. The .lds is a mix 
of "#include" and "#define" in the ldscript and depends on the config
too much.


> I have found the debugging names to be useful in the arium context, where 
> i can browse memory and look for strings etc. We should be able to print 
> these out at some points. 
> So move the c_payload to 0xfffe0000 and you'll have tons of room. So why 
> not do that? 
> Please don't remove the debugging names, the gain is very small and I 
> think that would be a mistake.
> ron

More information about the coreboot mailing list