FILO fixups

[Li-Ta Lo]

On Fri, 2004-10-29 at 16:53, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Ronald G. Minnich" <rminnich at lanl.gov> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Li-Ta Lo wrote:
> > 
> > > Since it appears nobody is maintaining FILO do you think we should put 
> > > it in util directory in freebios2?
> > > 
> > 
> > that's my plan.
> 
> Please let's give it's own namespace, just like freebios2 has.
> Or at least could we start a util tree for these kinds of things.
> 
> I'd like to keep the parts that are independent of the LinuxBIOS
> revision  a little separate so if we ever need to do something
> like the freebios2 tree again they can happily live again.
> 
> Romcc and config.g and one or two other utilities are tightly tied
> to the LinuxBIOS revisions so the make a lot of sense.
> 

I think we should move most of the utils into its own util package. The 
config tool should be move to a new directory call "tools" in freebios2.

Ollie