[LinuxBIOS] New hdama commit

[yhlu]

4. it's good, to move hardware mem hole support from raminit.c to
northbridge.c, So it will be dynamically. but problem is it will use
more MTRRs. So carry_on should be calculated in some way...

YH

On 8/9/05, yhlu <yinghailu at gmail.com> wrote:
> 3. are you sure the node1/core0 could start node1/core1?
> Accorinding to my testing last year, node1/core1 only can be started
> by node0/core0.
> 
> YH
> 
> 
> On 8/9/05, yhlu <yinghailu at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2. you overwite the enable ext id and apic id lifting
> >
> > YH
> >
> > On 8/9/05, yhlu <yinghailu at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > 1. write_irq_tables changes is overwrite by you. that will broke all
> > > other Opteron MB. Please change that back.
> > >
> > > YH
> > >
> > > On 8/9/05, Jason Schildt <jschildt at lnxi.com> wrote:
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > > I've just made a commit up to the public repository from the Linux
> > > > Networx repository mirror.  The changes only effect Opteron single/dual
> > > > core and hdama board specific code.
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > --jason--
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Jason W. Schildt
> > > > LinuxBIOS Software Engineer
> > > > Linux Networx
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > LinuxBIOS mailing list
> > > > LinuxBIOS at openbios.org
> > > > http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
> > > >
> > >
> >
>