[LinuxBIOS] LNXI Merge: lnxi-patch-15/16

yhlu yinghailu at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 05:47:03 CEST 2005

I agree.

The cache_as_ram_auto.c should be the same to all Opteron MB except for 
1 spd rom related.
2 superio related

Other thing is need to consider apic id lifting.

So i consider change that to 

#include "auto_1.c"
int someting spd and superio related
#include "auto_2.c"


On 9/6/05, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederman at lnxi.com> wrote:
> "Lu, Yinghai" <yinghai.lu at amd.com> writes:
> > I tried to make cache_as_ram_auto.c more smaller, the problem is
> > I can not use jmp __cpu_reset, and I need use goto cpu_reset_x
> The practical problem was not how much the code had to do
> (except for failover.c) but instead how little of that code
> was in common functions, and instead was per-motherboard.
> Implementing on one motherboard while experimenting is fine but when
> you go multi-board too much cut and paste is dangerous.
> The first round of dual core and cache as ram code feels
> like an old style adventure game:
> You have now entered a twisty maze of ifdefs.
> Eric
> --
> LinuxBIOS mailing list
> LinuxBIOS at openbios.org
> http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20050906/1f79579e/attachment.html>

More information about the coreboot mailing list