[LinuxBIOS] flashrom, uniflash.
c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net
Fri Sep 1 02:11:01 CEST 2006
Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> And then there's /dev/bios. It supports quite a lot of hardware
> and it talks to the hardware in a smarter way than most flash drivers
> in "flashrom". This is why I still get regular mails for the driver.
> But it should be all integrated in flashrom, its architecture is a lot
> more sane.
Oh. I had assumed flashrom was the successor of /dev/bios and other
flashing tools. Porting the code from /dev/bios to flashrom will
probably be a lot easier than trying to find out what uniflash does.
Stefan, do you have any plans in that direction?
More information about the coreboot