[LinuxBIOS] romcc manpage.

Uwe Hermann uwe at hermann-uwe.de
Fri Sep 8 19:12:09 CEST 2006

On Fri, Sep 08, 2006 at 12:04:14AM -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > What are people here thinking about GPL versions? Do you explicitly want
> > LinuxBIOS to be GPL v2? If so, why? I personally usually use "GPL v2 or
> > later", which will prevent hassle when GPL v3 will be here (and judging
> > from what I've read about GPL v3, that'll be fine with me, too).
> In part we are derived from the Linux kernel, and that is v2 only.
> And big chunks of LinuxBIOS are v2 only for the same reason.
> The License file proved is v2 of the License and not every contributor
> has been willing for v2 or later.

OK, that makes it very unlikely that we'll have a fully "GPL v2 or later"
LinuxBIOS (as a whole), so it's GPL v2 and will remain that way.

Cheers, Uwe.
Uwe Hermann 
http://www.it-services-uh.de  | http://www.crazy-hacks.org 
http://www.holsham-traders.de | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20060908/d6075faf/attachment.sig>

More information about the coreboot mailing list