[LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] [notready] my current v3 diff
rminnich at gmail.com
Mon Aug 27 21:35:19 CEST 2007
On 8/22/07, Uwe Hermann <uwe at hermann-uwe.de> wrote:
> Looks correct, but using "stages" _and_ "phases" will confuse the hell
> out of everyone. I vote for only using stage 0-2, just drop the phases
> terminology completely. Or maybe something like "which consists of
> multiple steps"?
oh, no, I don't think we want to do that. The document is pretty clear
about what a phase is, and what a stage is. Stage2 has 6 phases, etc.
I don't know any other way to say it, but if you think of one, let me know.
More information about the coreboot