[LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] cleaned up MCP55 chipset code
rminnich at gmail.com
Fri Feb 2 17:51:38 CET 2007
On 2/2/07, Segher Boessenkool <segher at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Some Guy <some at guy.com>
> > Acked-by: Some Gal <some at gal.com>
> > Applied-by: David H. Barr <dhbarr at gozelle.com>
> > OR
> > Commited-by: David H. Barr <dhbarr at gozelle.com>
> > Is there some blindingly obvious reason why one of these two wouldn't
> > be appropriate?
> Yes -- it's what Signed-off-by is for already :-)
you are assuming that signed-off-by implies commit rights, and it doesn't.
signed-off-by is necessary but not sufficient. acked-by is necessary
but not sufficient.
More information about the coreboot