[coreboot] Time for a new project
jordan.crouse at amd.com
Sun Apr 13 01:06:38 CEST 2008
On 11/04/08 16:43 -0700, ron minnich wrote:
> one simple suggestion. Your types are 32 bits. But the type numbers
> are things like
> 1, 2, 3 etc:
> I think it's worth it to bite the bulet and use more than the 3 lowest
> bits of the 32 bits, for several reasons:
> 1. it's easier to detect a bogus type if you use more bits, and bogus
> type detection is good for bogus problems.
> 2. With a jtag debugger, it's easier to verify that it really is a
> type and not just the number '1', etc.
> 3. use those bits! They're there for a reason :-)
> So, ignore me if you will, but how about
> 'BSS '
I dig this. We will make it so. I think we should also force all the
header members to be little endian to avoid issues later on with
Systems Software Development Engineer
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
More information about the coreboot