peter at stuge.se
Sun Apr 13 05:44:48 CEST 2008
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 05:05:29AM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> OTOH, the disadvantages of a new format are many. You'll have to
> write new tools for dealing with them. Those tools will have bugs.
Hopefully not so many if the new format is simple. In theory. :p
> The format *itself* will have bugs/shortcomings for quite a while,
Well, it will stabilize eventually.
> > If coreboot supports loading certain ELF files, it will be
> > surprising to (some) users if it does not support loading
> > all ELF files.
> This can be dealt with in the coreboot build system easily enough:
> just make sure to run the post-processor on all payload files.
Unfortunately that isn't the only way payloads come to coreboot.
lar will eventually be used to replace only the payload in a flash
lar can already be used to do so in a .rom file.
> The ELF loader in coreboot can easily detect this, too (it can
> check for a coreboot name segment, for example).
I actually don't care what internal representation we use for complex
binaries in LARs, as long as the lar utility can deal with common ELF
files, and maybe a few other binary formats too!
I don't want a separate preprocessor. We are reinventing mkelfImage.
More information about the coreboot