joe at settoplinux.org
Mon Apr 28 17:30:05 CEST 2008
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 16:36:32 +0200, Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:24:55AM -0400, Joe wrote:
>> >> I deffinatly think there should be some kind of criteria laid
>> >> down for new versions.
>> > Why?
>> Well, for example we have rules laid down for submitting patches to
>> the svn right? And, those rules serve a purpose right?
> Yes, definately. But keep in mind they don't control _when_ patches
> are submitted. ;)
>> Maybe, it is just me then, I work in a very structured bussiness
>> environment, where there are rules and guidlines to everything.
> I'm not saying policy is always bad, I'm just saying I think it will
> be tough to create a useful one for this.
>> And they serve their purpose for good reasons.
> My "why" question wasn't asking why rules in general, but rather if
> you had any suggestions about specific rules for this case - ie
> reasons and purposes that we would make rules for.
> If we can come up with some good ones then great, but I think it will
> be tough. If not, no big deal I say.
Ok, for now then can we go with Stefan's idea with tracker.coreboot.org and
see where that goes?
More information about the coreboot