[coreboot] Interesting (part of) article.
tiagomnm at gmail.com
Wed Dec 10 16:05:20 CET 2008
Probably, almost surely, most of the manufacturers never heard of Coreboot
or, if they did, don't know the current state of the project and if they can
use it or not.
I think that *pushing Coreboot as a plus for the enthusiast* would be
something to look into. Hardware enthusiasts are tweakers and, as such, like
to tweak, what better than offer them open-source code? It may not appeal to
all but it may for some. If manufacturers like the idea, than they'll
probably look into it.
I can try to talk to them, if someone has the time to talk to them
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 6:38 PM, ron minnich <rminnich at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 5:11 AM, Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote:
> >> And without support for Vista or even good support for XP, coreboot
> >> isn't a viable option IMO for most users.
> > Well, coreboot itself doesn't really care, and this is an important
> > point to make when talking to anyone who is new to the project. All
> > the magic is in the payload.
> and, when peter was visiting a few months ago, I watched XP install and
> It works for XP to some extent.
> Honestly, it never hurts to inform people. We may think they know;
> usually they don't.
> coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the coreboot