[coreboot] [RFC] Error out on implicit declarations

Myles Watson mylesgw at gmail.com
Fri Dec 19 20:30:39 CET 2008


On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Corey Osgood <corey.osgood at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Joseph Smith <joe at settoplinux.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:16:19 -0700, "Myles Watson" <mylesgw at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Joseph Smith <joe at settoplinux.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Arrh,
>> >> Looks like both of the 82830 boards are broken. What do I need to do to
>> > fix
>> >> them?
>> >>
>> > Do they still break after my last two patches?  I thought they were
>> fixed.
>> >
>> I was going by Corey's last abuild log. I appologize if you have fixed
>> them
>> since then.
>
> I don't know what was going on.  abuild ran fine for me.  I ran it again
and sure enough, it breaks.  Sorry about that.


>
>  rca/rm4100 is  still broken. All you should need to do is check that all
> the functions are properly declared, either by including their declarations
> in a header or an extern(al) declaration. Making the change in Carl-Daniel's
> patch will tell you very quickly if you got them all or not ;)
>
> Myles, those patches when applied with Maggi's break the amd pistachio and
> dbm690t. New abuild log with all 6? patches applied. I accidentally ran it a
> second time and lost the original log, so don't mind the "previously ok"
> comments, those boards were actually rebuilt and succeeded once.
>

I didn't try with Maggi's patches because you said they broke other boards.

Thanks,
Myles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20081219/0365685d/attachment.html>


More information about the coreboot mailing list