[coreboot] [RFC] Error out on implicit declarations
mylesgw at gmail.com
Fri Dec 19 20:30:39 CET 2008
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 12:16 PM, Corey Osgood <corey.osgood at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 1:19 PM, Joseph Smith <joe at settoplinux.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 19 Dec 2008 11:16:19 -0700, "Myles Watson" <mylesgw at gmail.com>
>> > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:03 AM, Joseph Smith <joe at settoplinux.org>
>> >> Arrh,
>> >> Looks like both of the 82830 boards are broken. What do I need to do to
>> > fix
>> >> them?
>> > Do they still break after my last two patches? I thought they were
>> I was going by Corey's last abuild log. I appologize if you have fixed
>> since then.
> I don't know what was going on. abuild ran fine for me. I ran it again
and sure enough, it breaks. Sorry about that.
> rca/rm4100 is still broken. All you should need to do is check that all
> the functions are properly declared, either by including their declarations
> in a header or an extern(al) declaration. Making the change in Carl-Daniel's
> patch will tell you very quickly if you got them all or not ;)
> Myles, those patches when applied with Maggi's break the amd pistachio and
> dbm690t. New abuild log with all 6? patches applied. I accidentally ran it a
> second time and lost the original log, so don't mind the "previously ok"
> comments, those boards were actually rebuilt and succeeded once.
I didn't try with Maggi's patches because you said they broke other boards.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the coreboot