[coreboot] SB600 flashrom hang (Patch)
Zheng.Bao at amd.com
Tue Dec 23 04:23:47 CET 2008
If the usec_delay() is called, the programming action will be unbearably
slow. I haven't got a way to solve this.
From: coreboot-bounces at coreboot.org
[mailto:coreboot-bounces at coreboot.org] On Behalf Of Peter Stuge
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2008 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: [coreboot] SB600 flashrom hang (Patch)
Bao, Zheng wrote:
> We have tested on the LPC and SPI ROM. The timeout value is OK on
> our board. You'd better test it on your board.
> Signed-off-by: Zheng bao <Zheng.bao at amd.com>
I would like to improve the busy wait loop. Is 1 ms the desired
timeout? In that case the myusec_delay(1000) call is good.
Is it better if the delay is longer or shorter than 1 ms?
coreboot mailing list: coreboot at coreboot.org
More information about the coreboot