[coreboot] r2 - trunk/openvsa/sysmgr
uwe at hermann-uwe.de
Mon Feb 11 16:29:36 CET 2008
On Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 10:58:51PM -0800, Chris Kilgour wrote:
> > Should the Signed-off-by: procedure be used also for the openvsa repo?
> In general I would agree, but in this case I was removing junk files of
> my own that I had let slip into my tarball that was used to seed the
> openvsa SVN tree. Since it was removal-only, I felt it was not a
> "contribution" but rather a "retraction" and therefore required no
> sign-off in that regard.
> Outside of this special case, I fully expect the sign-off/ack procedures
> will be followed.
Agreed, I think we should just use the sign-off procedure on _all_ our
repositories. Trivial fixes etc. can always be self-ACKed a la
Signed-off-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe at hermann-uwe.de>
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <uwe at hermann-uwe.de>
if that's needed, but even in that case the sign-offs themselves are
useful (IMO) to keep a consistent "trail" of all contributions, for
easy grepping in 'svn log' output etc. etc.
Can we add the usual svn hook for the openvsa repo (as well as all other
repos which don't have it yet)?
http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de
http://www.crazy-hacks.org | http://www.unmaintained-free-software.org
More information about the coreboot