[coreboot] progress on lx
rminnich at gmail.com
Tue Jan 22 20:04:03 CET 2008
On Jan 22, 2008 10:46 AM, Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote:
> Small thing; I would prefer something else than a comma after the
> type, so that it is separated from the real information. Maybe:
> I think that would make the syntax much more clear.
Thats fine with me, it is not really the "standard" for the dts but I
think we'd be better off making it clear.
> > > Further, in the dtc makefile I would like to preprocess pci_ids.h
> > > to produce arrays of char * with a list of vendor and device
> > > names. Then the dtc tool can do the following:
> > > check the path type (pci). Check that it has the proper arguments
> > > (device, path). Then check the vendor name and device name to
> > > make sure they are valid for that path type.
> > I'm undecided about this one. It adds complexity, but the
> > complexity helps verification of the code.
> But it's buildtime complexity which must be better than runtime
> complexity, and definately better than runtime failure.
That's my hope. I'm happy to make the buildtime more complex, as long
as it is more work for US, not the USERS :-)
I think we're going to benefit from increased error checking in the dts.
More information about the coreboot