[coreboot] patch: two bugs in the cs5536 ide code

ron minnich rminnich at gmail.com
Wed May 7 05:50:46 CEST 2008

On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se> wrote:

> This makes more sense, but..
> What was the reason for introducing multiple dts files for a single
> chip again?
> Only the C struct name limitations?
> *scratches forehead* I kind of want the single dts per chip back..

yep, me too. that's a concern. Also, I worry about people having to
deal with the nasty little thicket of tons of little file, all
(mostly) alike.

And we've got a vendor/devid. At what point are we asking people to
describe the bus/dev/fn too much?


More information about the coreboot mailing list