[coreboot] r3356 - trunk/util/flashrom
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net
Wed May 28 00:49:02 CEST 2008
On 28.05.2008 00:22, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
>> Author: stuge
>> Date: 2008-05-27 22:54:09 +0200 (Tue, 27 May 2008)
>> New Revision: 3356
>>
>> Modified:
>> trunk/util/flashrom/flashchips.c
>> Log:
>> flashrom: MX25L4005, S25FL016A, W39V040B, W39V080A, SST49LF008A tests.
>>
>> I have tested MX25L4005, S25FL016A and W39V080A myself.
>>
>> Thanks also to the following testers:
>> SST49LF008A Bernhard M. Wiedemann
>> W39V040B Dan Lenski
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se>
>> Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter at stuge.se>
>>
>>
>> Modified: trunk/util/flashrom/flashchips.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- trunk/util/flashrom/flashchips.c 2008-05-27 20:07:47 UTC (rev 3355)
>> +++ trunk/util/flashrom/flashchips.c 2008-05-27 20:54:09 UTC (rev 3356)
>> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
>>
> ...
>
>> - {"SST", "SST49LF008A", SST_ID, SST_49LF008A, 1024, 64 *
>> 1024, TEST_UNTESTED, probe_sst_fwhub, erase_sst_fwhub, write_sst_fwhub},
>> + {"SST", "SST49LF008A", SST_ID, SST_49LF008A, 1024, 64 *
>> 1024, TEST_OK_PR, probe_sst_fwhub, erase_sst_fwhub, write_sst_fwhub},
>>
>
> Did you try compiling this TEST_OK_PR? :)
> Fixed in r3357
>
Please revert and add a TEST_OK_PR definition. Only PR had been tested
for that chip.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
More information about the coreboot
mailing list