[coreboot] Subtractive Resources
marcj303 at yahoo.com
Fri Nov 7 19:43:28 CET 2008
----- Original Message ----
> From: Myles Watson <mylesgw at gmail.com>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ron minnich [mailto:rminnich at gmail.com]
> > On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 8:46 AM, Myles Watson wrote:
> > Marc made the case that things such as superio should not even be
> > "under" the lpc in the dts, since they stand "outside" the tree in
> > some sense. He argued that we should instead put them at top level.
> > There is merit to his argument. This would simplify the lpc code as
> > well.
> I think it's fine to have the lpc define resources since that's who
> implements them, but I like the idea of the resource being visible from the
> domain (maybe not outside the tree.)
I think you either have a separate legacy/subtractive/isa/lpc domain or it needs to be under the isa/lpc pci device. What I didn't really like was that it was uncontained in the domain. It was just sitting at the top level pci bus. BUT that is just a nit. Documented correctly etc I could live with it.
More information about the coreboot