[coreboot] r1047 - coreboot-v3/lib
stepan at coresystems.de
Thu Nov 20 18:23:13 CET 2008
svn at coreboot.org wrote:
> Author: mraudsepp
> Date: 2008-11-20 13:20:35 +0100 (Thu, 20 Nov 2008)
> New Revision: 1047
> Be silent in ram_check in non-debug loglevels
> As DBE61 support now runs ram_check for non-debug purposes and has expected failures
> on DBE61A, downgrade the per-address looped fail notification printk and other messages
> from BIOS_ERR to BIOS_DEBUG.
This patch looks odd.
Why do you run the ram test at all if the debug level is below DEBUG, if
none of the results are printed? Arguing with the parsable return code
sounds a bit outrageous and would lead to see the same error printed
twice with BIOS_DEBUG level.
Wouldn't the right fix be to explicitly only check those areas that pass
are not "expected to fail"?
If RAM does not check, it's an error, not a debug message, and it should
be printed as BIOS_ERR.
If auto.c tries to check areas that are not checkable (ie vga memory),
that's a bug in auto.c and should be fixed there.
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: info at coresystems.de • http://www.coresystems.de/
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the coreboot