[coreboot] [PATCH] workaround v2 VIA ROMCC breakage

Corey Osgood corey.osgood at gmail.com
Fri Oct 17 04:14:46 CEST 2008


On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Corey Osgood <corey.osgood at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:28 PM, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm at xmission.com>wrote:
>
>> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net> writes:
>>
>> > On 17.10.2008 02:50, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net> writes:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> I added a special case for ROMCC in the 0x...ULL constants in
>> vt8237r.h.
>> >>> Please see r3664.
>> >>> The remaining segfault is being investigated by Eric.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> It is reproducible, and it happens as the intermediate expression is
>> being
>> >> translated into intermediate code so it should be to weird to track.
>>  I'm
>> >> going to guess 4-5 hours to sort through it.  I will aim to look at it
>> this
>> >> weekend.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Wow, that was unexpected. Thanks for investing your time!
>>
>> Yes. If the bug was down in the optimizer it would take to long to track.
>>
>> Eric
>
>
> The break is caused by vt8237_early_spi_init(), most likely by spireg.
> Patch to disable that function in ROMCC is attached, I know that via
> epia-cn, pc2500, and jetway j7f2/4 don't use SPI, but I can't remember what
> the other C7/CN700 board is right this moment to check.
>

Bcom WinNet P680, which doesn't use SPI either, so we should be all good to
disable that function as far as current boards go.

-Corey
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20081016/b409cd6f/attachment.html>


More information about the coreboot mailing list