[coreboot] get_fx_devs

Myles Watson mylesgw at gmail.com
Fri Oct 24 20:14:51 CEST 2008

Something I noticed after I sent the patch is that this code (with or
without my patch) depends on the pointers being initialized to zero.  Is
that a valid assumption with gcc?


On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Myles Watson <mylesgw at gmail.com> wrote:

> get_fx_devs() was called very few places, and it wasn't needed except the
> first call.  I combined them.
> Signed-off-by: Myles Watson <mylesgw at gmail.com>
> Thanks,
> Myles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20081024/605554bf/attachment.html>

More information about the coreboot mailing list