[coreboot] K8 RAMinit problematic code

Stefan Reinauer stepan at coresystems.de
Mon Sep 1 19:29:51 CEST 2008


Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Interesting point of view. As long as we're allowed to make locking on
> pure uniprocessor architectures a no-op, I'm totally for it.
>
>   
The thing is, without those defines, figuring out whether we're SMP or
not is more complex than doing the actual locking.
So we might as well do the locking unconditionally, too.


-- 
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
      Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: info at coresystems.dehttp://www.coresystems.de/
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20080901/f685581e/attachment.sig>


More information about the coreboot mailing list