[coreboot] Romfs -> cbfs conversion

[Stefan Reinauer]

On 15.04.2009 23:50 Uhr, Myles Watson wrote:
>> I think there is, if the file format changes. If the contents is
>> always the same type I agree it's better to have only one name.
>>     
>
> In this case the difference is that one doesn't have a format.  In
> both cases the bootblock is in the same place and the code inside the
> image has to know where everything else is.
>   

Absolutely agreed. Adding another file extension will confuse the users,
even though we might successfully lie to ourselves about educating them.


-- 
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
      Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: info at coresystems.de  • http://www.coresystems.de/
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20090416/351cf483/attachment.html>