[coreboot] Romfs -> cbfs conversion

Stefan Reinauer stepan at coresystems.de
Thu Apr 16 00:42:22 CEST 2009

On 15.04.2009 23:50 Uhr, Myles Watson wrote:
>> I think there is, if the file format changes. If the contents is
>> always the same type I agree it's better to have only one name.
> In this case the difference is that one doesn't have a format.  In
> both cases the bootblock is in the same place and the code inside the
> image has to know where everything else is.

Absolutely agreed. Adding another file extension will confuse the users,
even though we might successfully lie to ourselves about educating them.

coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
      Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: info at coresystems.dehttp://www.coresystems.de/
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20090416/351cf483/attachment.html>

More information about the coreboot mailing list