[coreboot] [PATCH] flashrom - board enable - reconstruct table.
peter at stuge.se
Mon Apr 20 15:25:52 CEST 2009
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Should I now revert the table part of the patch because I nak it
> and the original conversion to multiline had more acks than the
> conversion back to single-line?
> Sorry, but this is just silly.
I hope you agree with Luc's and my points about how the wider format
> Is there any reason to hold off committing my own non-1.0 patches?
I don't know. Which do you mean? Is it those things in that other
thread, where some are in trac but you also had some good new tickets?
There is too much to keep trac(k) of and the list isn't a great
tracker for me. Sorry. :\
More information about the coreboot