[coreboot] [PATCH] more intelligent cbfs walker
patrick at georgi-clan.de
Sat Apr 25 17:20:05 CEST 2009
Am 25.04.2009 17:10, schrieb Myles Watson:
> Have you seen this happen? If so delete is broken. Delete zeroes freed
Can we be sure to have only one implementation that writes cbfs?
I've seen quite some weird stuff happen (for example, the first version
of the patch should _always_ end up in an infinite loop, but it didn't
at first), and given that this part of the code can make the difference
between "works" and "hangs with black screen", I'll rather be paranoid
about these issues.
More information about the coreboot