[coreboot] [PATCH]More consistent behaviour for printk_*
corey.osgood at gmail.com
Mon Apr 27 21:32:14 CEST 2009
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:26 PM, ron minnich <rminnich at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think moving the v3 style printk to v2 makes the most sense.
If we're going to keep spending time making v2 more v3-like (printk, CBFS,
Kconfig, etc), then why even bother with v3? v3 seems like it's got some
really great advantages, but noone seems to care about finishing it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the coreboot