[coreboot] [PATCH]More consistent behaviour for printk_*
rminnich at gmail.com
Mon Apr 27 21:55:18 CEST 2009
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:41 PM, Patrick Georgi <patrick at georgi-clan.de> wrote:
> Am 27.04.2009 21:26, schrieb ron minnich:
>> I think moving the v3 style printk to v2 makes the most sense.
> Would that fix the issue I brought up?
yes, because the function call or other side effect is always there,
and the code is always executed, not compiled out. It would fix that
side-effect issue quite nicely.
More information about the coreboot