[coreboot] [PATCH]More consistent behaviour for printk_*
c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net
Mon Apr 27 22:58:02 CEST 2009
On 27.04.2009 21:43, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> On 27.04.2009 21:41, Patrick Georgi wrote:
>> Am 27.04.2009 21:26, schrieb ron minnich:
>>> I think moving the v3 style printk to v2 makes the most sense.
>> Would that fix the issue I brought up?
> AFAICS it wouldn't.
Apologies for that incorrect statement. I had remembered a patch which
changed v3 to the v2 style of compiling out some messages (which would
have resulted in three different printk levels (compiled-in messages,
printed-by-default messages and printed-with-current-level messages)
instead of only two levels) and thought that had been committed. Maybe
it was Myles who posted that patch, I can't remember anymore.
> But romcc interactions might become "interesting"
> (register shortage etc.).
The ROMCC interactions are still a probably valid concern.
ROM size might become a problem as well. After all, not everybody needs
all SPEW level messages compiled in.
To be honest, the longer I think about it, the more I favour the
three-level approach with the ability to compile some messages out.
More information about the coreboot