[coreboot] [PATCH]More consistent behaviour for printk_*

Carl-Daniel Hailfinger c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net
Mon Apr 27 23:01:38 CEST 2009

On 27.04.2009 21:32, Corey Osgood wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:26 PM, ron minnich <rminnich at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think moving the v3 style printk to v2 makes the most sense.
> If we're going to keep spending time making v2 more v3-like (printk, CBFS,
> Kconfig, etc), then why even bother with v3? v3 seems like it's got some
> really great advantages, but noone seems to care about finishing it.

I still hope we can whip v2 in shape well enough that major parts can be
transplanted into v3.



More information about the coreboot mailing list