[coreboot] domain vs device statictree order

ron minnich rminnich at gmail.com
Thu Jan 8 05:29:28 CET 2009

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:35 AM, Myles Watson <mylesgw at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I guess it's not really breadth first.  It's just parents before siblings.
>>> I think this should be done for all the phases unless there's some
>>> compelling reason not to.
>> I don't think having different phases run in different order is a good
>> idea, as it can lead to unexpected code execution orders all over again.
> I agree.
>> Code-wise this looks good if all phases act the same way.
> Without this patch Phase1, Phase2, and Phase6 are done in statictree
> order, and Phase3, Phase4, and Phase5 are done Parents before
> children.
> I don't see Phase1 being used anywhere.  Phase2 is handled with the
> patch.  I think Phase6 should be updated, and I can send a patch.
> Ron?

I am still sort of out but you guys are on the right approach, do what
you think best. I trust you ...


More information about the coreboot mailing list