[coreboot] domain vs device statictree order

[Ward Vandewege]

On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 08:52:44AM -0700, Myles Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:58 AM, Ward Vandewege <ward at gnu.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 09:39:39PM -0700, Myles Watson wrote:
> >> > The rev that broke the boot was 1089 or 1090. 1089 does not build, so I can't
> >> > tell for sure. 1088 boots fine. 1090 is broken.
> >>
> >> They might have well been the same commit because they were
> >> interdependent.  It was just an easier way of looking at the changes
> >> for me.
> >>
> >> Thanks for tracking it down.  Could you send me a log from 1088?
> >> Hopefully we can track it down quickly.
> >
> > Sure, see attached.
> 
> The biggest difference that I see is that there is no graphics device
> (PCI 1.1) in the broken one.  In 1088 it was found dynamically (not in
> the tree), but now it isn't found at all.
> 
> Since it was supposed to be disabled by:
> 	/* this board does not really have vga; disable it (pci device 00:01.1)  */
> 			unwanted_vpci = < 80000900 0 >;
> in the dts, I'm not sure why it disappeared now.
> 
> Possible solution:
> - Try it again without the unwanted_vpci line in the dts.
> 
> I guess I don't understand why the device is gone now.  I didn't think
> the changes I've made would make the device disappear.

I have not tried that yet, but here's a boot log from v1108, which still does
not boot but it stops in a different place now, it seems.

Thanks,
Ward.

-- 
Ward Vandewege <ward at fsf.org>
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 13.cap.gz
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 22820 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/attachments/20090108/bdf98ecd/attachment.obj>