[coreboot] Flashrom jedec probe patch + AT29C010A logs
c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net
Wed Jun 3 01:06:16 CEST 2009
On 03.06.2009 00:58, Maciej Pijanka wrote:
> On 03/06/2009, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006 at gmx.net> wrote:
>> If timing is not set (0), maybe fail as well? That would be accomplished
>> by killing the above if branch and changing the message below to say
>> "negative/ininitialized value".
> sure, but that will fail/skip silently most chips so we also should
> change printf_debug to normal one otherwise nobody without -V notice
Yes! For the "not set" and the "negative value" case, this should
definitely be printf, not printf_debug.
> that they was skipped not probe failed
> (maybe we need more than two levels of verbosity?)
> or some nice way to notify user when -V is not used something like
> '%d chips probe were skipped, use -V to figure why'
I think your suggestion of using prinf instead of printf_debug is best.
More information about the coreboot