[coreboot] EP80579 Mainboard support
arnaud.maye at 4dsp.com
Wed Jun 24 15:36:29 CEST 2009
Good afternoon gents,
The ECC enable code has been fixed. It does enable the ECC when the DIMM
I did enable the RAM check and indeed this showed miserable results.
I've been trying to figure out
the correct settings but so far they are not there! Trying a few
BSEL/VSEL jumper settings with a
couple of different DIMM we have here showed some decent results, the
value I read back starts
to look as the value I send.
I've tried a reverse engineer approach. Plug a DIMM into the system and
launch Linux with the
legacy BIOS. lspci -xxx then shows me the IMCH BAR and implicitly the
settings doctored by the
legacy BIOS. The first try I've done was to try the r-e DRT0/DRT1 in the
coreboot RAM init code.
Not much differences so far. But anyway I've seen quite a lot of
difference around the ODT register
and such. So there is still some hope.
I will keep you guys updated as soon it is moving forward.
One thing I cannot figure out so far, is what the peripheral 0.8.0 is.
This seems to be an non existing
peripheral, this is the assumption I make so far. It is not documented
in the EP80579 documentation.
I am referring to raminit_ep80579.c function spd_set_drt_attributes().
val = (magic[index]);
print_debug("magic = ");
pci_write_config32(PCI_DEV(0, 0x08, 0), 0xcc, val);
So what is this magic value about and what the devnbr8 on bus0 is are
the thing I would love to hear from
you guys. It is clear that the magic value is different for given DDR
Ed Swierk wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:06 AM, Arnaud Maye<arnaud.maye at 4dsp.com> wrote:
>> I've narrowed down the problem to the mtrr.c file in src/cpu/x86/mtrr/ in
>> the function set_fixed_mtrrs().
>> The first time disable_cache() is called, the CPU gets "lost". It either
>> hang or jump back to some code
>> to hang a bit after.
>> Am not 100% sure but I would say that as soon we disable the cache, the
>> processor is "forced" to
>> execute from RAM and not from the cache itself, having this strange behavior
>> here can still mean the
>> memory controller settings are not correct, right?
> That does seems like symptom of memory controller misconfiguration.
> I'd recommend you proceed by disabling ECC (comment out the "Set the
> ECC mode" line in raminit_ep80579.c) and enabling the ram_fill() and
> ram_verify() steps in auto.c. Adjust the parameters to fill and verify
> the entire memory range. This is a very simple test that should pass
> reliably before you try anything fancy like booting a payload.
More information about the coreboot