[coreboot] Does the fam10 code work now? Patches for discuss.

Marc Jones marcj303 at gmail.com
Mon Jun 29 20:33:39 CEST 2009


On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Bao, Zheng<Zheng.Bao at amd.com> wrote:
> Can you tell me which is the patch or send it to me?
>
> If I set CONFIG_COMPRESS to 1, the copy is fast. But if the code jumps
> to RAM, the system will reboot. Is it also caused by same reason? Why
> doesn't dbm690t have that problem?

I don't know about the reset. i think that the K8 does have the same
issue but the amount of code copied is much less. The fam10 code is
much larger.

The thread you want to look at is this one:
http://www.coreboot.org/pipermail/coreboot/2008-October/040885.html

I think that a better solution is to fix up the disable car and copy
code to cache the rom.  For example adding

set_var_mtrr(1, XIP_ROM_BASE, XIP_ROM_SIZE, MTRR_TYPE_WRBACK);

to set_init_ram_access() would address the issue. Maybe you can try that.

Marc

-- 
http://marcjonesconsulting.com




More information about the coreboot mailing list