[coreboot] IRQ 9 on s2895 and s2892

Myles Watson mylesgw at gmail.com
Wed Mar 11 18:32:35 CET 2009

On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:29 AM, Rudolf Marek <r.marek at assembler.cz> wrote:
>> I'm assuming that since I have the problem on my Tyan s2895 and s2892,
>> and they have different superIOs that that's not the problem.  What do
>> you think?
> Ok then. But it is worth to check if there is no misconfiguration. The IRQ
> regs are on std places.
OK.  I'll compare superiotool output from factory and Coreboot.

>> Ah.  I'm sorry I think you've tried to tell me this multiple times but
>> I've missed it.  You're saying that the IRQ is getting sent to two
>> different IRQs and one of them has a handler, but the other doesn't?
> Yes thats what I think. Second option is that it is something else like some
> nVidia ACPI timer, but this is unlikely becuase we would have seen this
> before the changes.
> Maybe you can boot orig coreboot sources and see what device listens on IRQ
> 9 ;)

Sure.  I'll try that too.


More information about the coreboot mailing list