[coreboot] patch: add romfs to V2
peter at stuge.se
Tue Mar 31 04:18:07 CEST 2009
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> > There's another reason to do that. '1' is a common constants.
> > 0x31313131 is not. I like to
> > make important constants have complex values that can be caught from
> > (e.g.) a JTAG memory dump.
> What about 0x4c415232 instead? That's "LAR2".
> >> Can we use some magic other than "ORBC"?
> > I don't see the problem, but I'll take a suggestion.
Let's start with working out the name. :)
More information about the coreboot