[coreboot] Resource allocator in v2
mylesgw at gmail.com
Sat May 9 04:59:57 CEST 2009
> >> I've had a few complaints about the stage numbering/naming in v3 ....
> >> would you preserve that or ...
> > The naming is unimportant to me as long as it's clear that we:
> > 1. Read resources
> > 2. Allocate them
> > 3. Write them to hardware
> > Last time I asked for suggestions there was no consensus on good names.
> Then stick with the v2 names.
Since v2 has one compute_allocate_resource it will become compute_resource
and allocate resource then.
More information about the coreboot