[coreboot] [PATCH] Table code cleanup

Myles Watson mylesgw at gmail.com
Mon May 18 20:36:15 CEST 2009

> Something else I don't understand is why UMA allocation is saved until
> enable.  Shouldn't it be done with resource allocation?  It doesn't make
> sense to do it after the tables are written.
I was wrong here.  Have you edited some of the log messages?  I can't
find "uma_memory_start" in my tree.


More information about the coreboot mailing list