[coreboot] #137: S2895 no function after coreboot 2 flash
ward at gnu.org
Tue May 19 20:49:10 CEST 2009
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 12:42:18PM -0600, Myles Watson wrote:
> > At any rate, Myles, maybe you should bump the coreboot rev for s2895
> > in buildrom to the one you have confirmed working?
> I always argued for buildrom using the latest version of Coreboot. In this
> case the payload (SeaBIOS) continued to evolve.
Yeah - but having a 'known good' combination in buildrom is quite useful too.
> I guess there's no good way around bit rot. I'm hoping that we'll continue
> to improve the v2 build process enough that there will be no need for
> buildrom except to build payloads.
Yep. I want to/need to take a stab at converting buildrom to use CBFS. Ah,
Ward Vandewege <ward at fsf.org>
Free Software Foundation - Senior Systems Administrator
More information about the coreboot