[coreboot] [flashrom] [patch] Intel 28F001BX-T (& -B) probe & read support + test report

Urja Rannikko urjaman at gmail.com
Thu May 28 09:20:07 CEST 2009


Why nobody bothers to answer?......
(I'm thinking that Person A thinks Person B will do it and Person B
thinks Person C will do it who thinks Person A will do it ... hmm)
The patch was really short (inlined here just to show you (i dont
guarantee that gmail passes it ok)):
Index: flash.h
===================================================================
--- flash.h	(revision 543)
+++ flash.h	(working copy)
@@ -344,6 +344,8 @@
 #define IM_29F004T		0xAF

 #define INTEL_ID		0x89	/* Intel */
+#define P28F001BXT		0x94	/* 28F001BX-T */
+#define P28F001BXB		0x95	/* 28F001BX-B */

 #define ISSI_ID			0xD5	/* ISSI Integrated Silicon Solutions */

Index: flashchips.c
===================================================================
--- flashchips.c	(revision 543)
+++ flashchips.c	(working copy)
@@ -754,6 +754,34 @@

 	{
 		.vendor		= "Intel",
+		.name		= "28F001BX-B",
+		.manufacture_id	= INTEL_ID,
+		.model_id	= P28F001BXB,
+		.total_size	= 128,
+		.page_size	= 128 * 1024, /* 8k + 2x4k + 112k */
+		.tested		= TEST_BAD_ERASE|TEST_BAD_WRITE,
+		.probe		= probe_jedec,
+		.erase		= NULL,
+		.write		= NULL,
+		.read		= read_memmapped,
+	},
+
+	{
+		.vendor		= "Intel",
+		.name		= "28F001BX-T",
+		.manufacture_id	= INTEL_ID,
+		.model_id	= P28F001BXT,
+		.total_size	= 128,
+		.page_size	= 128 * 1024, /* 112k + 2x4k + 8k */
+		.tested		= TEST_OK_PR|TEST_BAD_ERASE|TEST_BAD_WRITE,
+		.probe		= probe_jedec,
+		.erase		= NULL,
+		.write		= NULL,
+		.read		= read_memmapped,
+	},
+
+	{
+		.vendor		= "Intel",
 		.name		= "82802AB",
 		.manufacture_id	= INTEL_ID,
 		.model_id	= 173,


-- 
urjaman




More information about the coreboot mailing list