[coreboot] [flashrom] [patch] Intel 28F001BX-T (& -B) probe & read support + test report
Urja Rannikko
urjaman at gmail.com
Thu May 28 09:20:07 CEST 2009
Why nobody bothers to answer?......
(I'm thinking that Person A thinks Person B will do it and Person B
thinks Person C will do it who thinks Person A will do it ... hmm)
The patch was really short (inlined here just to show you (i dont
guarantee that gmail passes it ok)):
Index: flash.h
===================================================================
--- flash.h (revision 543)
+++ flash.h (working copy)
@@ -344,6 +344,8 @@
#define IM_29F004T 0xAF
#define INTEL_ID 0x89 /* Intel */
+#define P28F001BXT 0x94 /* 28F001BX-T */
+#define P28F001BXB 0x95 /* 28F001BX-B */
#define ISSI_ID 0xD5 /* ISSI Integrated Silicon Solutions */
Index: flashchips.c
===================================================================
--- flashchips.c (revision 543)
+++ flashchips.c (working copy)
@@ -754,6 +754,34 @@
{
.vendor = "Intel",
+ .name = "28F001BX-B",
+ .manufacture_id = INTEL_ID,
+ .model_id = P28F001BXB,
+ .total_size = 128,
+ .page_size = 128 * 1024, /* 8k + 2x4k + 112k */
+ .tested = TEST_BAD_ERASE|TEST_BAD_WRITE,
+ .probe = probe_jedec,
+ .erase = NULL,
+ .write = NULL,
+ .read = read_memmapped,
+ },
+
+ {
+ .vendor = "Intel",
+ .name = "28F001BX-T",
+ .manufacture_id = INTEL_ID,
+ .model_id = P28F001BXT,
+ .total_size = 128,
+ .page_size = 128 * 1024, /* 112k + 2x4k + 8k */
+ .tested = TEST_OK_PR|TEST_BAD_ERASE|TEST_BAD_WRITE,
+ .probe = probe_jedec,
+ .erase = NULL,
+ .write = NULL,
+ .read = read_memmapped,
+ },
+
+ {
+ .vendor = "Intel",
.name = "82802AB",
.manufacture_id = INTEL_ID,
.model_id = 173,
--
urjaman
More information about the coreboot
mailing list